tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32843335.post8204650834287167377..comments2009-11-06T21:00:17.822+08:00WINNY LIhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10712263839400006541noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32843335.post-74395957516426576322009-11-06T21:00:17.822+08:002009-11-06T21:00:17.822+08:00whoow, what a shoes?!!reyahhttp://reyah23.blogspot.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32843335.post-8635445450079509772009-11-04T04:04:39.790+08:002009-11-04T04:04:39.790+08:00Follow <a href="http://follow.streetstylenews.com" rel="nofollow"><b>StreetstyleNews</b></a> on Twitter and never again miss any update of the world&#39;s finest streetstyle blogs!StreetstyleNewshttp://www.streetstylenews.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32843335.post-41947086161040475662009-10-28T06:17:20.562+08:002009-10-28T06:17:20.562+08:00The reason Designers usually make clothing that isn&#39;t per-say &quot;wearable&quot; is because they have separate lines of clothes that they design for the everyday woman and seeing how less than 30% of most clothing that is shown on the runway is sold, why wouldn&#39;t you go for the art, the beauty, vision and concept of the story you are showing, through clothing. Besides, a lot of the dresses and jewelry were &quot;wearable&quot;.maximhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04992624048006927047noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32843335.post-47195531928474502362009-10-10T08:28:51.177+08:002009-10-10T08:28:51.177+08:00i agree, definitely pieces of art but not wearable. they remind me of deformed feet that are a resultant of chines foot binding. <br /><br />YOU ARE WHAT YOU WEAR @ clothesarecute.blogspot.comK. Julienhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06657714861891288315noreply@blogger.com